Archives for posts with tag: book

First meetings cover imageA collection of short stories, this contains the original Ender novella plus two stories with his parents (The Polish Boy and Teacher’s Pest), and one story set after Ender’s Game (Investment Counselor).

I loved Ender’s Game, found the following ones increasingly a drag, and gave up on the Shadow series. This short story collection is the last work I read of Scott Card’s. And this was because I got sick of his politics getting in his way. In particular, I got sick of being told I should have had 14 children by now and the only reason I haven’t is because I’ve been brainwashed by feminists.
Read the rest of this entry »

Edward Trencom's Nose cover imageSubtitled A novel of history, dark intrigue, and cheese, Edward Trencom’s Nose certainly manages the first and last, but fails on the intrigue bit.

Milton is known more for his accessible non-fiction such as the bestselling Nathaniel’s Nutmeg and White Gold (though I will always have a soft spot for his forgotten first, The Riddle and the Knight: in Search of Sir John Mandeville). Edward is an attempt to spin his built-in audience and history research into success in fiction too, and to some extent it must have worked, because his second novel, According to Arnold is out soon.

Arnold is about a man obessed with mushroom who has been married for 12 years. Edward is about a man obsessed with cheese who has been married for 12 years. Why mess with a winning formula? Except it’s not very winning, at least not for me.

Edward opens with the happy ending. Edward awakes from a weeks’ long sleep, his sensitive and powerful nose a-quiver with the scent of a beloved variety of cheese and his loving wife awaiting him with open arms. He’s had a lucky escape after a trip overseas. Now, normally a prologue of this kind is a point around which the rest of the book revolves: we flash back and see the lead up to the prologue scene, and then the rest of the book is what happens after the prologue scene.

So I thought the prologue’s final words “It looks as if Mr Trencom is at long last on the mend” would turn out to be ironic as our hero plunges into even worse straits. I had to revise this assessment as we edge, slow by painfully slow inch towards the trip to Greece that put him into the palsied state the book opens with. After a time, it became obvious that the story really had opened with the ending, which sucked away the last little bit of interest.

And to the cheese. Now, I’m a big fan of stories that delve into areas of obsession outside the mainstream or showcase the intricacies of things we all take for granted. Perfume for example, tells us all about the sometimes unlovely art of perfume-making. That book springs to mind because Edward too deals with scents and a sensitive nose, this time in the service of cheesemongering. Unfortunately, the details of cheese are really left to naming the varieties – and yes, truly, there are astonishing varieties, but it’s all a bit superficial.

Milton instead puts his efforts into repeating, over and over, the very simple plot points of this novel. The basic story is that Edward discovers he is being followed and almost at the same time uncovers some family history which leads him to discover that the male members of his family for the last nine generations have died early and under mysterious circumstances, often in Constantinople or its environs. And it appears to have something to do with the famous Trencom nose.

It’s not enough for Edward to discover the death in his storyline; we get a flashback of the death of each man in their own chapters. This doesn’t stop Milton from repeating the details of the death as Edward discovers it. But at least he only tells us twice. A lot of other times, he tells the reader something a half-dozen times. Lord, I get it, would you move on, please?

He also feels the need to dwell lovingly on things like the flood in the cellar of the cheese-shop, the description of which, I kid you not, goes on for five pages. Five pages! I get it, move on! And whenever characters may be about to do something dangerous, like Edward’s wife going to confront the man who is following him, it steers off safely.

Not that there was any tension anyway, what with the happy ending being up front in the prologue and all. That, and the fact that the central mystery of the book is so easily guessible, makes the book utterly lack intrigue, and the characters don’t make up for it.

Meanwhile, the dialogue is incredibly dull, in that it is terribly realistic, the kind of banal things that people say every day. I’m not decrying real-life banal conversation – it’s not like I don’t participate – but it doesn’t belong in novels, which are supposed to be more interesting than day-to-day life. Though maybe fans of very gentle reality TV programs would like this touch.

I’ve spoken before about British humour. I suspect, given that this book was meant to be witty, that there’s more than one kind, and this kind is not my cup of tea.

Interested despite my review? Buy it from Fishpond.com.au, Australia’s biggest online bookstore. All their book prices are guaranteed better than Amazon and they do free delivery for orders over $50.

Triplet princesses (or more accurately, earl’s daughters) are kidnapped from their securely warded home and then dumped in a scary underground world called the Dismals. Now they must make their way out with the help of a enigmatic boy-wizard, find their way back to their family, and, incidentally, save the world.

I went into this eagerly: three strong female leads and a mysterious young wizard? I wrote one with that exact set-up (coming soon), though of course totally different from this one. I like reading stand-alone fantasy novels (and oh boy are they are hard to find) with good female characters (also hard to find), and this should have been exactly my cup of tea.

But…

The only reason this book slipped past my 50-page rule was because it is by Andre Norton, the “grande dame” of fantasy, and I just kept thinking I’d get pay-off in the end. But I didn’t. It’s my first try at reading one of hers, and will be my last.

Firstly, it’s very old-fashioned, understandably enough, since this was one of the last books Norton wrote, after a career of more than one hundred books, and she was in her 90s by then. But opening with an info-dump of the history of the family and the land? Annoyingly old hat, and illogical besides, since the conceit is that the three girls are writing out their adventures for the queen, who you would think would already know this stuff.

And continually producing some new concept or piece of history or magic type just when it’s needed instead of having some foreshadowing or introducing the item a little earlier so it doesn’t come out of nowhere (eg yargargy, a terribly addictive power-boosting plant, suddenly mentioned for the first time only when they need it)? Gives the impression she was making it up as she went along and didn’t bother revising. It’s not that hard to mention something in passing when you’re going to need it later, especially when the plot is moving as slowly as this one does.

The language is also heavy-going, deliberately archaic, convoluted and formal. This matches the time period very well, of course, but it had the effect of almost pushing my attention away; I either found myself skimming, trying to get past the endless description to the next important event, or reading without taking anything in – when I could force myself to pick it up and get another page done at all. One inside cover blurb claims it’s “aimed primarily at younger readers”…I have to think if I had trouble reading it, a 15-year-old isn’t going to thrive.

All three girls take turns narrating/writing the account to the queen. Except they sound exactly alike – fair enough, they’re triplets, raised together, they’ll sound alike – but then there’s little point switching back and forth between them, especially, as happens often, within a few paragraphs. It’s distracting and unnecessary. I spent the entire book waiting for the reason for this device – would one die? (obviously not, since all three are writing the account afterwards, so there goes that tension source) Would they become separated? (never for long, though they do all take turns collapsing a lot) Would they end up on different paths by the end? (nope)

The character of the three girls was the most disappointing part. They are not active participants in their own story, but instead spend the entire time being driven and manipulated by forces outside themselves. Even their new powers that manifest themselves do exactly that – manifest without the girls having to work at them, draw them out, or do anything other than be passive receptacles. They rarely know what’s happening, why or how, it just happens through them, not because of them.

The wizard, Zolan, spends the whole time in the Dismals manipulating them, testing them – basically lying to them and screwing them around – and when he explains why, they just accept it passively and go along with it, trusting him when he has given them no reason for it.

He per force must be their guide in the Dismals, but when they finally get out to the above-ground world where he has never been, and you’d think they’d get the chance to lead now they’re in their own environment…no, he’s still the one rushing forward and being the leader. And then their parents show up, and they’re back to being the daughters of the family.

All three are so frustratingly passive and that does not change over the course of the book (despite the bit of defiance at the very end with the ‘we shall choose our own husbands’ bit).

Perhaps I went into this book with too-high expectations given the reputation of Norton; perhaps this is an unusual style of book for her. But I was disappointed by all aspects of it – the writing, the characters, and the plot. Not recommended.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers